They concoct arbitrary rules which make sense to them, and them alone, to justify processes without any justification.
So if a new user causes problems they eradicate all traces of that person, but if it's an older ( because of earned reputation ) user that's too "disruptive" to punish other users of their fantasy currency. Older users are more likely to agree with their arbitrary rules. New users are not. They won't punish you if some old developer finally has had enough of their process insanity. Were an older user to get fed up, the ripple of discontent in imaginary reward land would be serious and substantial. They couldn't sweep it under the rug.
According to Wikipedia:
A 2013 study has found that 77% of users only ask one question, 65% only answer one question, and only 8% of users answer more than 5 questions.[27] As of 2011, 92% of the questions were answered, in a median time of 11 minutes.[28] Since 2013, the Stack Exchange network software automatically deletes questions that meet certain criteria, including having no answers in a certain amount of time.
Can anyone one else see the flaw in their logic?
